Since 1968, Sopan Narsinga Gaikwad, 108, had been fighting a land dispute. Before being dismissed, the case had been pending in the bombay high court for 27 years. The supreme court agreed to hear the appeal on July 12 this year after Sopan Narsinga Gaikwad's counsel argued that the delay in filing the appeal could be explained by the fact that the elderly petitioner lived in a rural area of maharashtra and learned of the high court's decision much later, and was stuck due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.


in the supreme court of india The guy who took his case all the way to the supreme court was not alive when he learned that his case had been agreed to be considered. "He died before the case was heard in court on July 12. He will now be represented by legal heirs."

The supreme court has issued notice on the application for a stay of execution against the high court rulings dated october 23, 2015, and february 13, 2019, as well as the application for a stay of execution against the high court orders dated october 23, 2015, and february 13, 2019. In addition, Justices DY Chandrachud and Hrishikesh Roy have asked for a response from the opposing parties within eight weeks. The court noted that because the individual is from a rural location, the attorneys involved may have been unable to locate him after the case was dismissed in 2015.

In 1968, Sopan Narsinga Gaikwad bought a parcel of property through a recorded sale deed. He discovered that it had previously been mortgaged to a bank in lieu of the original owner's debt. When a bank failed on a debt, the bank sent a notice of attachment on Sopan Nartsinga's property. On september 10, 1982, the trial court accepted his argument and issued a decision in his favour. The first appeal was filed by the original owner, and the ruling was overturned in 1987.

మరింత సమాచారం తెలుసుకోండి: