
Arguments in the ap high court on the anticipatory bail petition filed by tdp chief chandrababu naidu in the amaravati Inner Ring Road case have ended. The court said that it is reserving judgment on this. Arguments in the ap high court on the anticipatory bail petition filed by tdp chief chandrababu naidu in the amaravati Inner Ring Road case have ended. After hearing the arguments of both sides, the court reserved its verdict. While siddharth Luthra argued virtually on behalf of Chandrababu, AG sriram argued on behalf of CID. In this case, the high court has issued orders to adjourn the CID investigation of tdp National General Secretary nara lokesh to october 10. The high court heard the lunch motion petition filed by lokesh in the Inner Ring Road case on Tuesday. nara lokesh filed a lunch motion objecting to the provisions of the 41A notice issued by the CID. Posani Venkateswarlu argued on his behalf. He brought to the court's attention that lokesh is a shareholder in Heritage.. In order to give resolutions to him, the company has a procedure to provide details of bank accounts. On the other hand, the CID lawyers stated that they will not put any pressure on them to submit the documents.