acharya, starring megastar chiranjeevi, ranked among the worst films of the year. This koratala Siva-directed movie starred ram charan in a significant role. Veteran writer Paruchuri Gopalakrishna reviewed the movie at the same time and identified a few factors that contributed to its downfall.
Gopalakrishna claimed that acharya made him think about his movie Maro Malupu on the most recent episode of his programme. He asserted that the key themes of Maro Malupu include thievery, Naxalism, and a temple setting. He emphasised that telugu cinema in the 1980s included a lot of Naxalite movies.
Paruchuri praised chiranjeevi for accepting the Naxalism setting that koratala had chosen for his story. However, Paruchuri claimed that this generation is not receptive to movies about naxalism. He advised the filmmakers to keep in mind that suspense and emotion do not mix well. He believed that rather than saving his full story for the second half, Charan's character should have at least been hinted to in the first half.
Paruchuri added that Charan shouldn't have played the Siddha role. According to Paruchuri, "Chiranjeevi garu's character could have been given more emphasis, and the flashback should have been given less prominence." "Only one star hero is required for a single mission. One star alone can manage it. The music in this film did not excite me either. Furthermore, I thought chiranjeevi Garu's role didn't require dance numbers," he added. Paruchuri also stated that the title acharya is inappropriate for the movie.
Gopalakrishna claimed that acharya made him think about his movie Maro Malupu on the most recent episode of his programme. He asserted that the key themes of Maro Malupu include thievery, Naxalism, and a temple setting. He emphasised that telugu cinema in the 1980s included a lot of Naxalite movies.
Paruchuri praised chiranjeevi for accepting the Naxalism setting that koratala had chosen for his story. However, Paruchuri claimed that this generation is not receptive to movies about naxalism. He advised the filmmakers to keep in mind that suspense and emotion do not mix well. He believed that rather than saving his full story for the second half, Charan's character should have at least been hinted to in the first half.
Paruchuri added that Charan shouldn't have played the Siddha role. According to Paruchuri, "Chiranjeevi garu's character could have been given more emphasis, and the flashback should have been given less prominence." "Only one star hero is required for a single mission. One star alone can manage it. The music in this film did not excite me either. Furthermore, I thought chiranjeevi Garu's role didn't require dance numbers," he added. Paruchuri also stated that the title acharya is inappropriate for the movie.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel