A proposal reportedly being explored by the telangana government — to set up a Vantara-style wildlife facility or night safari near hyderabad — has set off a storm of questions.
Ecologists, conservationists, and policy experts warn that such a project could spiral into a legal, ethical, and environmental disaster.
The worry intensifies as reports suggest that 1000 acres originally acquired for Pharma City may be diverted for this venture. With unresolved controversies already surrounding the Vantara model in Gujarat, telangana risks inviting massive public backlash and global scrutiny.
Here’s why this project must be stopped before it starts.
💥 WHY telangana MUST NOT ALLOW A VANTARA-TYPE ZOO NEAR HYDERABAD
1️⃣ Leaked Reports Hint at a Hasty Push — Not a Thought-Through Plan
media reports — allegedly leaked by the state government — indicate that the proposal may be formalized during the telangana Rising Global Summit.
Critics argue this sudden timing suggests political optics over scientific consultation, raising fears of a project rushed without rigorous impact assessment.
2️⃣ The Land Question: 1000 Acres Taken for Pharma City May Be Reallocated
According to reports, land acquired from farmers for hyderabad Pharma City may be offered to a Reliance-linked organization for the wildlife project.
This raises serious questions:
How do pharma factories and exotic wildlife coexist?
Why divert land promised for industrial development?
What safeguards protect farmers’ original interests?
The optics alone are troubling.
3️⃣ Global Investigations Have Raised Questions About Vantara’s Model
international media investigations have alleged irregularities in sourcing exotic animals for Vantara in Jamnagar.
Some reports claim the facility received large numbers of animals from regions associated with wildlife trafficking networks.
While these claims remain unproven, introducing such a model in telangana risks similar controversies and potential compliance conflicts with indian and international wildlife laws.
4️⃣ Transparency Concerns: Experts Say Oversight Is Weak and Data Scarce
Wildlife biologists, NGOs, and conservation groups have repeatedly flagged:
No published sourcing protocols
No clear rehabilitation or release strategy
Unclear breeding policies
Limited mortality reporting
A private or semi-private wildlife facility near hyderabad could be even harder to regulate — a governance nightmare waiting to happen.
5️⃣ The Vantara Model Contradicts Modern Conservation Principles
True conservation focuses on habitats, ecosystems, and species recovery.
Accusations against Vantara’s approach argue that accumulating exotic fauna:
Does not protect ecosystems
Does not support native biodiversity
May expose animals to climates unsuitable for their well-being
If telangana cares about conservation, experts say this is the wrong direction entirely.
6️⃣ Ethical Concerns: Critics Warn of “Elite Entertainment” Under the Guise of Conservation
Past reports and commentary have suggested that some wildlife facilities risk being used for exclusive experiences rather than genuine conservation.
Whether or not these claims are accurate, the association alone brings enormous ethical baggage.
Telangana cannot afford to allocate public land to a project that may attract global criticism.
7️⃣ Allegations of media Suppression Raise red Flags
Several outlets have reported difficulties in publishing critical stories about Vantara-related operations.
Any project surrounded by allegations of suppressed scrutiny lacks the transparency required for partnership with a state government.
8️⃣ telangana Already Has a World-Class Zoo — Why Not Strengthen It?
Rather than create a controversial new facility, experts argue that the government should:
Modernize Nehru Zoological Park
Invest in native species protection
Restore degraded habitats
Expand scientific conservation programs
These deliver public value without legal, ethical, or environmental risk.
9️⃣ The Project Risks Becoming a Reputational and Governance Disaster
A wildlife project with:
Land acquisition controversy
Environmental uncertainty
Ethical concerns
Transparency problems
international criticism potential
…is not what a new state government wants on its hands.
The public benefit is unclear, but the public backlash would be guaranteed.
⚠️ THE FINAL WORD: telangana MUST PAUSE, REVIEW, AND REJECT THIS PROJECT
Until there is:
Full public consultation
Independent ecological assessment
Proven transparency
Clear legal compliance
No diversion of farmer-acquired land
…the telangana government should not move forward.
Some risks are simply too big — and this one sits at the crossroads of ethics, ecology, governance, and public trust.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel