From delhi to Patna, the reason for Nitish Kumar’s displeasure is being searched. Political analysts are

discussing many speculations and speculations. JDU sources say that there are 3 big reasons for Nitish Kumar’s

displeasure...

1. congress wavering attitude

According to JDU sources, the biggest reason for Nitish Kumar’s displeasure is the wavering attitude of

Congress. nitish kumar is not considering congress as a serious ally. Nitish’s allies say that its initiative started

in september 2022, but even after 15 months, the concrete impact of the alliance has not been seen on the

ground. According to JDU sources, nitish kumar is holding congress responsible for all this. A senior JDU

leader, on the condition of anonymity, told ABP news that congress is breaking its promises. During a meeting

in march 2023, the party had talked about making nitish kumar the convenor to unite everyone, but after the

formation of the alliance, the congress high command did not take the initiative.

2. Political pressure of Lalu Yadav

There is also political pressure from Lalu Yadav on Nitish Kumar. Lalu Yadav wants Nitish to leave bihar and

do delhi politics and leave the post of chief minister of bihar to his son Tejashwi Yadav. There is also mention

of an agreement regarding this in political circles. It is being said that this agreement was signed in July 2022.

However, neither JDU leaders nor RJD leaders want to say anything on this openly.

3. Displeased with the bad words of the leaders

nitish kumar is also said to be angry with the bad words of congress and DMK leaders. JDU sources say that

the way the rhetoric is going on right now. If this continues further, bjp will win the elections. In the meeting of

India Alliance, nitish kumar advised all the leaders not to fall into the trap of BJP. During his speech, Nitish said

that talk about taking everyone along. Nitish said in the meeting that if any leader gives a statement for

publication, then people of all parties should pay attention to it.

Find out more: