JSW Metallic, a leading metal maker in india, acquired over-indebted steel maker bhushan Energy and Steel Limited (BPSL) in 2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. This act permits new owners to take over high-debt belongings in order that the authentic creditors can get repaid.
The purchase already faced a couple of prison hurdles, inclusive of ED's right over certain assets as a result of cash laundering and fund acquisitions by means of preceding owners.
Here's a timeline of the activities.
Your occasion
Also, in 2017, BPSL defaulted on positive loans. BPSL's total debt to creditors: ₹forty-seven,000+ crore.
In July 2017, BPSL was admitted to insolvency under the IBC Code, 2016.
In february 2019, JSW Metallic wins the bid with a ₹19,700 crore offer; the committee of lenders (banks) approves.
Jul 2019 NCLT approves the resolution plan.
Jan 2020 legal hurdles floor; ED attaches BPSL assets, mentioning cash laundering by using preceding promoters.
In Feb 2020, NCLAT clears the plan and protects JSW beneath phase 32a of the IBC.
In march 2021, JSW can pay ₹19,700 crore; BPSL will become a JSW subsidiary.
In Oct 2021, JSW will increase its stake to 83.3% and rename the entity to JSW bhushan Strength & Metallic.
In Dec 2024, the sc ordered ED to hand over property worth over 4.5 crore of BPSL to JSW Metal.
May additionally 2025 sc regulations entire resolution system unlawful; orders liquidation of BPSL.
Source: media articles, court docket filings, JSW Metallic's change filings
What came about these days?
On May 2, 2025, the excellent court dominated that the entire resolution plan of JSW Metal to accumulate BPSL is illegal. The choice led to a ~6% correction in JSW's share fee, as this came as a surprise.
The court objected to key problems:
JSW Metallic had funded the purchase using a combination of equity and optionally convertible debentures (OCDs, or debt). The courtroom dominated that beneath IBC pointers, acquisitions must be merely equity-funded to ensure transparency and commitment.
The courtroom strongly criticized the put-off in completing the decision procedure, which had passed the prescribed 330-day timeline.
The ED had connected BPSL's property, suspecting they were proceeds from money laundering. The NCLAT manner allowed JSW to take control of those assets. The courtroom determined that the NCLAT had no authority to study the ED's actions.
Non-compliance with sure guidelines of the IBC Code, 2016, and certain guidelines of courts/banks, which includes proving its eligibility to end up a bidder.
With this judgment, the courtroom ordered the liquidation of BPSL has put an overhang on JSW's ownership in the organization.
Effect on JSW metallic
The choice to reject the resolution plan and order the liquidation of bhushan Strength & Steel has had a right away and unfavorable effect on JSW Metal, evident from a correction in the inventory rate.
Expansion plans at BPSL formed a vital part of JSW's broader capability growth strategy. JSW's long-term imaginative and prescient plan to scale potential to 51.5 MTPA by 2030 from 35.7 MTPA presently consists of BPSL's potential growth, while overall capacity expansion might also take a hit because of the capability impact of this ruling on its balance sheet.
Source: JSW Metallic Investor Presentation; *All capacities are in mt. 1: five.0 mt capability at Vijayanagar under commissioning; 2: problem to board approvals
Acquisition/investment—effect on balance sheet
JSW Metal paid ₹19,700 crore to collect BPSL, representing 8.5% of its overall belongings. With liquidation now ordered, there may be no clarity on how tons of this may be recovered. The modern-day enterprise valuation of BPSL might be around ₹30,000 crore, thinking about capability enlargement and advanced overall performance.
Ability and sales extent
BPSL added 2.75 million tonnes in line with the annum (MTPA) of steel potential. This accounted for 12.5% of JSW Steel's general capacity.
Capex
JSW had deliberated to extend this to five MTPA via Section II. The ₹4,488 crore capex earmarked for that is now in danger. Some growth-related centers have already been commissioned.
EBITDA—impact on P&L
BPSL contributed approximately 10% to JSW Metallic's consolidated EBITDA. Analysts estimate a ₹4,000-₹5,000 crore impact on annual EBITDA.
JSW Metal is expecting the SC's written order to decide its future route of movement.
Manner ahead: What can JSW do?
Record for assessment: JSW can record an assessment petition inside the preferred courtroom. However, evaluate petitions are hardly ever familiar except there may be a clean prison mistake or new proof. The court docket changed into sturdy in its language, calling the plan a "flagrant violation," making this path uncertain.
Take part in liquidation: As a creditor who has infused capital, JSW could declare dues all through liquidation. It may additionally bid for BPSL belongings again, although this time at probable distressed prices.
Revisit boom approach: JSW will now want to locate alternative routes to meet its increased objectives. Options encompass
New brownfield expansions at present centers.
Greenfield projects (even though costlier and slower).
Exploring smaller M&A possibilities.
Effect on banks: creditors brace for clean uncertainty
The court's order to liquidate BPSL has raised sparkling worries for the consortium of banks that had extended loans to the agency. Leading lenders like punjab National bank, allahabad bank, and others had already marked recoveries from the ₹19,700 crore JSW Metallic payout as a part of their resolved belongings under the IBC system.
With the decision now overturned, those recoveries are at risk of being legally questioned or reversed during liquidation. If JSW Steel's investment is deemed invalid, banks could be forced to reclassify the exposure as non-performing again, probably triggering fresh provisions or write-downs.
This no longer handiest impacts their financials, however, also dampens the outlook for recoveries from other massive confused assets below IBC, in particular the ones facing prison-demanding situations. The episode underscores the fragility of resolution profits for banks in cases in which prison closure is extended or uncertain.
Bank mortgage amount recovered (in crores)
SBI 3,930
PNB 2,440
Canara financial institution 1,490
Indian bank 1,060
Bank of Baroda 1,050
Indian Overseas bank 420
Axis financial institution 350
IDBI bank 230
J&K financial institution, one hundred and seventy
Karur Vysya financial institution one hundred forty
JSW Metallic, a leading metal maker in india, acquired over-indebted steel maker bhushan Energy and Steel Limited (BPSL) in 2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. This act permits new owners to take over high-debt belongings in order that the authentic creditors can get repaid.
The purchase already faced a couple of prison hurdles, inclusive of ED's right over certain assets as a result of cash laundering and fund acquisitions by means of preceding owners.
Here's a timeline of the activities.
Your occasion
Also, in 2017, BPSL defaulted on positive loans. BPSL's total debt to creditors: ₹forty-seven,000+ crore.
In July 2017, BPSL was admitted to insolvency under the IBC Code, 2016.
In february 2019, JSW Metallic wins the bid with a ₹19,700 crore offer; the committee of lenders (banks) approves.
Jul 2019 NCLT approves the resolution plan.
Jan 2020 legal hurdles floor; ED attaches BPSL assets, mentioning cash laundering by using preceding promoters.
In Feb 2020, NCLAT clears the plan and protects JSW beneath phase 32a of the IBC.
In march 2021, JSW can pay ₹19,700 crore; BPSL will become a JSW subsidiary.
In Oct 2021, JSW will increase its stake to 83.3% and rename the entity to JSW bhushan Strength & Metallic.
In Dec 2024, the sc ordered ED to hand over property worth over 4.5 crore of BPSL to JSW Metal.
May additionally 2025 sc regulations entire resolution system unlawful; orders liquidation of BPSL.
Source: media articles, court docket filings, JSW Metallic's change filings
What came about these days?
On May 2, 2025, the excellent court dominated that the entire resolution plan of JSW Metal to accumulate BPSL is illegal. The choice led to a ~6% correction in JSW's share fee, as this came as a surprise.
The court objected to key problems:
JSW Metallic had funded the purchase using a combination of equity and optionally convertible debentures (OCDs, or debt). The courtroom dominated that beneath IBC pointers, acquisitions must be merely equity-funded to ensure transparency and commitment.
The courtroom strongly criticized the put-off in completing the decision procedure, which had passed the prescribed 330-day timeline.
The ED had connected BPSL's property, suspecting they were proceeds from money laundering. The NCLAT manner allowed JSW to take control of those assets. The courtroom determined that the NCLAT had no authority to study the ED's actions.
Non-compliance with sure guidelines of the IBC Code, 2016, and certain guidelines of courts/banks, which includes proving its eligibility to end up a bidder.
With this judgment, the courtroom ordered the liquidation of BPSL has put an overhang on JSW's ownership in the organization.
Effect on JSW metallic
The choice to reject the resolution plan and order the liquidation of bhushan Strength & Steel has had a right away and unfavorable effect on JSW Metal, evident from a correction in the inventory rate.
Expansion plans at BPSL formed a vital part of JSW's broader capability growth strategy. JSW's long-term imaginative and prescient plan to scale potential to 51.5 MTPA by 2030 from 35.7 MTPA presently consists of BPSL's potential growth, while overall capacity expansion might also take a hit because of the capability impact of this ruling on its balance sheet.
Source: JSW Metallic Investor Presentation; *All capacities are in mt. 1: five.0 mt capability at Vijayanagar under commissioning; 2: problem to board approvals
Acquisition/investment—effect on balance sheet
JSW Metal paid ₹19,700 crore to collect BPSL, representing 8.5% of its overall belongings. With liquidation now ordered, there may be no clarity on how tons of this may be recovered. The modern-day enterprise valuation of BPSL might be around ₹30,000 crore, thinking about capability enlargement and advanced overall performance.
Ability and sales extent
BPSL added 2.75 million tonnes in line with the annum (MTPA) of steel potential. This accounted for 12.5% of JSW Steel's general capacity.
Capex
JSW had deliberated to extend this to five MTPA via Section II. The ₹4,488 crore capex earmarked for that is now in danger. Some growth-related centers have already been commissioned.
EBITDA—impact on P&L
BPSL contributed approximately 10% to JSW Metallic's consolidated EBITDA. Analysts estimate a ₹4,000-₹5,000 crore impact on annual EBITDA.
JSW Metal is expecting the SC's written order to decide its future route of movement.
Manner ahead: What can JSW do?
Record for assessment: JSW can record an assessment petition inside the preferred courtroom. However, evaluate petitions are hardly ever familiar except there may be a clean prison mistake or new proof. The court docket changed into sturdy in its language, calling the plan a "flagrant violation," making this path uncertain.
Take part in liquidation: As a creditor who has infused capital, JSW could declare dues all through liquidation. It may additionally bid for BPSL belongings again, although this time at probable distressed prices.
Revisit boom approach: JSW will now want to locate alternative routes to meet its increased objectives. Options encompass
New brownfield expansions at present centers.
Greenfield projects (even though costlier and slower).
Exploring smaller M&A possibilities.
Effect on banks: creditors brace for clean uncertainty
The court's order to liquidate BPSL has raised sparkling worries for the consortium of banks that had extended loans to the agency. Leading lenders like punjab National bank, allahabad bank, and others had already marked recoveries from the ₹19,700 crore JSW Metallic payout as a part of their resolved belongings under the IBC system.
With the decision now overturned, those recoveries are at risk of being legally questioned or reversed during liquidation. If JSW Steel's investment is deemed invalid, banks could be forced to reclassify the exposure as non-performing again, probably triggering fresh provisions or write-downs.
This no longer handiest impacts their financials, however, also dampens the outlook for recoveries from other massive confused assets below IBC, in particular the ones facing prison-demanding situations. The episode underscores the fragility of resolution profits for banks in cases in which prison closure is extended or uncertain.
Bank mortgage amount recovered (in crores)
SBI 3,930
PNB 2,440
Canara financial institution 1,490
Indian bank 1,060
Bank of Baroda 1,050
Indian Overseas bank 420
Axis financial institution 350
IDBI bank 230
J&K financial institution, one hundred and seventy
Karur Vysya financial institution one hundred forty
General 12,four hundred
Supply: financial institution change filings, court docket rulings, media articles
In precise
The very best courtroom's ruling on bhushan electricity & steel is a turning factor now, not only most effective for JSW metal but also for India's insolvency resolution atmosphere. It exposes cracks in how big IBC cases are handled, from delays and funding structures to enforcement gaps.
For JSW, the verdict follows:
A likely write-down of almost ₹25,000 crore (funding + capex already incurred).
A reset in its capability growth roadmap.
A capability EBITDA decline in the near term.
At the same time as the business enterprise nonetheless has felony alternatives, the immediate future is marked by using uncertainty. For buyers, this episode highlights an important lesson: even high-profile offers sponsored by courtroom approvals can face reversal in India's legal framework. A careful method closer to businesses undertaking huge burdened asset offers under IBC is warranted.
Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be taken into consideration as investment advice. Investors need to seek advice from specialists earlier than making any investment choices.
General 12,four hundred
Supply: financial institution change filings, court docket rulings, media articles
In precise
The very best courtroom's ruling on bhushan electricity & steel is a turning factor now, not only most effective for JSW metal but also for India's insolvency resolution atmosphere. It exposes cracks in how big IBC cases are handled, from delays and funding structures to enforcement gaps.
For JSW, the verdict follows:
A likely write-down of almost ₹25,000 crore (funding + capex already incurred).
A reset in its capability growth roadmap.
A capability EBITDA decline in the near term.
At the same time as the business enterprise nonetheless has felony alternatives, the immediate future is marked by using uncertainty. For buyers, this episode highlights an important lesson: even high-profile offers sponsored by courtroom approvals can face reversal in India's legal framework. A careful method closer to businesses undertaking huge burdened asset offers under IBC is warranted.
Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be taken into consideration as investment advice. Investors need to seek advice from specialists earlier than making any investment choices.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel