Heroes always have one key edge over any technician working on the movie, and that advantage is the visual aspect. The hero receives the most attention since they are the face of the movie, regardless of how good it may be. To get to the point, some of Prabhas' detractors have argued that whereas rajamouli put in all the effort, prabhas received a lottery ticket for Baahubali's pan-Indian popularity and attention.

Currently, a video clip from an interview with a Mumbai-based media house CEO who allegedly worked on rrr is being shared by Prabhas's supporters. The aforementioned person claims in the interview that rajamouli is only known in the North because of Baahubali. Who is familiar with ntr and ram charan in Tier 2 hindi towns? rrr was advertised as the movie from Baahubali's director. This is being used by Prabhas's supporters to suggest that no matter how much effort and finesse rajamouli put into making Baahubali, prabhas is the movie's face and his outstanding presence is the reason it was able to reach a wider hindi audience.

They are utilising this to reject the lottery defence. Accordingly, several fans of North indian cinema claim that prabhas is what drew them to Baahubali. However, it should be remembered that any director is only constrained to media appearances and promotional activities. The actor will be the face of the movie and hence receive all the attention. It's improper to minimise somebody. While films like titanic and avatar are huge box office successes, not everyone is aware of or appreciates james Cameron's contribution to them. So let common sense rule, and instead of taking credit for individual efforts, everyone should start appreciating the group effort.

మరింత సమాచారం తెలుసుకోండి: